The Speaker of the House of Representatives is one of the most prominent positions in the entire United States government — although one would not get that impression from the Constitution itself. Our founding document mentions the Speakership only in passing. Article I, Section 2 states, “The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers.” That’s it.
Yet the modern Speaker’s powers within the House are immense—much more than the Speaker of the House of Commons, from which the American office derives its inspiration. The Speaker of the American House arguably wields more power than the Senate majority leader, for the rules of the upper chamber allow for much more initiative from individual members than those of the House.
The Speaker exercises enormous, often decisive influence on every stage of the policymaking process through his influence over committee appointments and authorities over legislative processes.
First, the Speaker directs the distribution of committee assignments. The two parties make these decisions internally — the Republicans through their Steering Committee and the Democrats through their Steering and Policy Committee. The Speaker chairs the relevant committee for his party. He makes sure that committees reflect the interests and priorities of the party, and can use assignments as a way to reward and punish members, as some committees (like Appropriations) wield more power than others (like Science, Space, and Technology). The Speaker also has the power to refer bills to committees.
Second, the Speaker chooses members of the House Rules Committee, commonly known as the “Speaker’s Committee” because of its loyalty to him. The Rules Committee decides what bills will be considered on the floor of the House, as well as the rules governing their consideration (for example, whether amendments will be heard). This gives the Speaker near plenary power to set the House’s agenda. Supplementing this is his authority to determine the timing of district work periods and to shutter the House and send members home.
Third, the Speaker possesses the right to decide who speaks first when two members request the floor of the House. This gives him the power to determine how debate will flow on the floor of the House. All told, little in the House can happen without the acquiescence of the Speaker. Even dramatic events where the Speaker loses control — like the ousting of Speaker Kevin McCarthy by Matt Gaetz and other dissident Republicans in October 2023 — are remarkable because they are rare.
These powers did not emerge overnight. The first Speaker of the House, Frederick Muhlenberg of Pennsylvania, wielded little formal power. The first session of the First Congress was dominated in the House by James Madison, who had no formal position besides member. In later sessions, Alexander Hamilton exerted immense power, as President George Washington’s de facto prime minister, even though he was not a member of Congress at all, but rather Secretary of the Treasury. The first Speaker with real political power was Henry Clay, who took the gavel starting in 1811.
Clay’s authority stemmed from his skills as a politician, rather than a shift in the underlying institutional arrangements in the House. Subsequent House Speakers were thus relatively modest in their powers. The sectional strife of the 1840s and 50s resulted in extended deadlocks for the election of the Speaker, and eventually Speakers chosen by a plurality of members rather than a majority. That was not a recipe for potent leadership.
After the Civil War, the Speaker’s power grew as partisan divisions between Democrats and Republicans hardened. The seventy years between the Civil War and World War I was a period of strong Speakers — like Schuyler Colfax, James G. Blaine, Thomas Brackett Reed, and finally Joseph Cannon — who consolidated power. For instance, it was Reed who did away with the “vanishing quorum,” or the practice whereby members of the minority could delay business by refusing to register their presence in a quorum vote. Reed told the Clerk of the House to record the presence of those who remained silent during the vote, and thereby stripped from the minority a major tool to delay the business of the House.
The Progressive movement saw an end to the era of the strong Speaker. In 1910 Democrats and progressive Republicans — frustrated by Speaker Cannon’s hold on the chamber — revolted. They stripped the position of a great deal of power, distributed it broadly throughout the House and much of it to the chairs of standing committees, whose position was secured through length of tenure. Successful Speakers in the mid-20th century, like Sam Rayburn, governed not by reigning but by brokering.
This period of decentralized House authority lasted for fifty years, until dissension within the Democratic Party forced a new regime change. The committee system, with its privileging of tenure, tended to elevate conservative, Southern Democrats to positions of power. While there were periods in which Northern liberals could dominate the whole House — the New Deal Congresses of 1933-37 and the Great Society Congress of 1965-67 — these Southern conservatives could usually join with Northern Republicans to create a de facto majority coalition to put the brakes on liberal reforms. Successive waves of Northern liberal members — particularly from the 1958 and 1974 midterm elections — finally brought about substantial changes in House rules, reducing the role of the committee chairs and centralizing it within majority caucus.
When Republicans took control of the House in 1995, they retained many of these institutional reforms created by Democrats. They also added a new twist — the Speaker as nationwide party leader and fundraiser. Republican Newt Gingrich was a highly effective fundraiser for the party, and today’s Speaker — be it Democratic or Republican — is expected to bring in large sums of money for the party. Today’s Speakership is not simply limited to management legislative workflow, but making the case for the party in the broader electorate.
Not to go unmentioned is the swelling of the Speaker’s managerial authority. The legislative branch expanded over the 20th century; various administrative offices and buildings to were established the Capitol complex or buildings, so grew the Speaker’s authority. For example, the Speaker nominates the Chief Administrative Officer, who oversees much of the mundane but essential operations of the House.
The role of the Speaker has evolved so drastically because, under the Constitution, the House has control over its rules and procedures. Thus, the specific powers of the Speaker reflect the broader political and institutional challenges that House members collectively are trying to solve with their rules. Strong Speakers tend to correspond to periods with strong parties — like 1860 through 1910 and 1975 through today. In both cases, a relatively unified majority party sought to use the rules to enforce ideological hegemony on the institution, and the Speaker was the primary agent of this control. On the other hand, periods of internal party dissension — such as in the antebellum era or left-right divide within the Democrats from the 1930s through the 1970s — correspond to periods of weak Speakerships, as members do not want an ideologically disparate group within their party dictating terms.
Today’s Speaker of the House is thus a powerful agent in government precisely because he leads an ideologically unified majority party, which has empowered him to govern on its behalf. While it may seem strange that a House with 435 members would vest so much power in a single individual, the Speaker’s authority is delegation, not usurpation. Rank-and-file members empower the Speaker because they prefer order over chaos.
Jay Cost is the Gerald R. Ford Senior Nonresident Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is the author of five books, most recently Democracy or Republic? The People and the Constitution (AEI Press, 2023).
Stay in the know about our news and events.